Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11687042›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Preoperative blood transfusions for sickle cell disease.

C Riddington, L Williamson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preoperative blood transfusions for sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2017
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recommendations for the transfusion of red blood cells.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2009
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Stroke in sickle cell disease in Africa: case report.East African medical journal · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C RiddingtonInstitute of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, UK, L12 2AP. cerir@liverpool.ac.uk
L Williamson
AstraZeneca (Brazil) · BRUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSickle cell disease is one of the most common inherited diseases in the world, and causes haemolytic anaemia, vaso-occlusive crises and dysfunction in virtually any organ system in the body. Surgical procedures are often required. Blood transfusion regimes can be used preoperatively in an attempt to increase transport of oxygen around the body and dilute the sickled red blood cells, thus reducing the risk of vaso-occlusion.

objectivesTo assess the relative risks and benefits of preoperative blood transfusion regimes in patients with sickle cell disease undergoing surgery of any type in any setting. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search: January 2001 SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing preoperative blood transfusion regimes to different regimes or no transfusion in patients with sickle cell disease undergoing surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data from the study included. MAIN

resultsOnly one trial met the inclusion criteria for the review. The trial compared an aggressive transfusion regime (decreasing sickle haemoglobin to less than 30%) to a conservative transfusion regime (increasing haemoglobin to 10 g/dl) in 604 elective operations in patients with sickle cell disease. The conservative regime was found to be as effective as the aggressive regime in preventing perioperative complications, and was associated with less transfusion related adverse events. No randomised controlled trials were found for transfusion compared to no transfusion. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsWhile in general conservative therapy appears to be as effective as aggressive in preparation for surgery in sickle cell patients, further research is needed to examine the optimal regime for different surgical types, and to address whether preoperative transfusion is needed in all surgical situations.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellBlood TransfusionHumansPreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID11687042
OpenAlexW4246116798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.