SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stepping down from inhaled corticosteroids with leukotriene inhibitors in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Allergy and asthma proceedingsPooled it
- Step 4: stick or twist? A review of asthma therapy.BMJ open respiratory research · 2016Article
- Inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma: the story continues.European journal of pediatrics · 2011Review
- Benefit-risk assessment of antileukotrienes in the management of asthma.Drug safety · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
1 author at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-leukotriene (AL) agents are being considered as "add-on" therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in chronic asthma.
objectivesTo examine the safety and efficacy of daily AL plus ICS compared to ICS alone, and determine the corticosteroid-sparing effect of AL when added to ICS in chronic asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl (all up to 2001), reference lists of review articles and trials, contacted international headquarters of AL manufacturers and ATS meeting abstracts (1998-2000). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised placebo-controlled trials of asthmatics aged 2 years and older lasting at least one month. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted data independently. Trials were grouped by asthma control at baseline (symptomatic or well-controlled) and dose of ICS in the control group (same or double). MAIN
resultsOf 336 citations, 11 trials (only adults) met inclusion criteria. Six were published in full-text, eight were high quality. Daily dose of ICS was 300-2000 mcg beclomethasone-equivalent. In symptomatic adults, AL (at 2-4 times licensed dose) combined with ICS reduced the number of patients with exacerbations that required systemic corticosteroids, compared to ICS alone [Relative Risk (RR) = 0.34; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.13, 0.88]. This equates to 20 patients (95% CI 1,100 patients) treated to prevent one needing systemic corticosteroids. There was no difference in side effects. No trials tested the efficacy of licensed doses of ALs as add-on to ICS. In symptomatic adults, addition of zafirlukast to ICS did not reduce the number of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, compared to doubled dose ICS [RR= 1.39; 95% CI: 0.63, 3.08)]. There were no differences in any other measure of outcome. Higher doses of zafirlukast than currently licensed were associated with increased risk of liver enzyme elevation. In ICS-sparing trials of AL agents there was no difference in ICS dose after 12-16 weeks [Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 1.9% change; 95% CI -3.5, 7.3], and no difference in lowest tolerated dose of ICS [WMD= 44 mcg/d; 95% CI -59, 148)]. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsUsed as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids, high dose anti-leukotrienes reduced exacerbations, but there is no evidence to support their use at currently licensed doses. There is insufficient evidence to indicate whether they confer benefit over doubling the dose of corticosteroids. There is no evidence that they have any significant inhaled corticosteroid-sparing effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.