Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11687003›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers.

A Forster, J Smith, J Young, P Knapp, A House, J Wright

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Written information about individual medicines for consumers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Education about family caregiving: advocating family physician involvement.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The role of communication in paediatric drug safety.Archives of disease in childhood · 2007
    Review
  17. Review of stroke rehabilitation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Review
  18. Informal care giving for disabled stroke survivors.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004
    Article
  19. Medications, comorbidities, and medical complications in stroke survivors: the CAReS study.Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A ForsterDepartment of Health Care for the Elderly, St Luke's Hospital, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK, BD5 ONA. a.forster@leeds.ac.uk
J Smith
J Young
P Knapp
A House
J Wright

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe provision of information has been recommended as a key component of service provision after stroke. However, research suggests that patients' understanding of stroke and associated issues remains poor. We determined to undertake a systematic review of information provision strategies for patients and their carers after stroke.

objectivesTo examine the effectiveness of an information and/or education strategy to improve the outcome of stroke patients and/or their identified caregivers. SEARCH STRATEGY: Relevant trials were identified in the Cochrane Stroke Group Specialised Trials Register (last searched: June 2000). Additional intervention-based search strategies were developed for: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR) Medline; Embase; CINAHL; ISI citation index; Science and Social Science Citation Indexes; ISI Web of Science Service; Aslib Index to UK theses; Dissertation Abstracts International, ASSIA and Psychlit/PsycINFO. We also searched the Journal of Advanced Nursing, bibliographies of retrieved papers, relevant articles and books. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two or three investigators independently assessed trials and abstracts identified for eligibility, methodological quality and other participant characteristics. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently using piloted data extraction forms. The primary outcomes were knowledge about stroke and stroke services, and impact on health, specifically mood. MAIN

resultsWe identified 152 abstracts, of which 36 studies were potentially relevant to this review. The current analysis includes nine completed trials, a further eight studies are ongoing. Of the nine trials, three evaluated a programme of lectures and the remaining trials evaluated the provision of information. There is some evidence that information combined with educational sessions improved knowledge and was more effective than providing information only. Information provision only had no effect on mood, perceived health status or quality of life for patients or carers. Two trials used an objective measure of satisfaction and no significant differences were found between groups. One trial reported that information and education sessions for carers improved 'family functioning'. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe results of the review are limited by the variable quality of the trials and the wide range of outcome measures used. The general effectiveness of information provision has not been conclusively demonstrated. Future work should address the expressed needs of patients and carers and seek to identify appropriate teaching strategies which can be successfully implemented within clinical practice.

Indexed as

CaregiversPatient Education as TopicStrokeCase-Control StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.