Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11686982›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.

V H Rice, L F Stead

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Do placebo response rates from cessation trials inform on strength of addictions?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Executive Summary of the 2018 Joint Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Italy.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V H RiceCollege of Nursing, Wayne State University, 5557 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA. Vfrice@aol.com
L F Stead

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care professionals, including nurses, frequently advise patients to improve their health by stopping smoking. Such advice may be brief, or part of more intensive interventions.

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of nursing delivered smoking cessation interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group register was searched for studies of interventions using nurses or health visitors and an additional search made on CINAHL. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials with follow-up of at least 6 months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently. MAIN

resultsSixteen studies comparing nursing intervention to a control or usual care found intervention to significantly increase the odds of quitting (Peto Odds Ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.29-1.73). There was heterogeneity between the study results, but pooling using a random effects model did not alter the estimate of effect. There was no evidence from indirect comparison that interventions classified as intensive had a larger effect than less intensive ones. There was limited evidence that interventions were more effective for hospital inpatients with cardiovascular disease than for inpatients with other conditions. Interventions in non hospitalised patients also showed evidence of benefit. Five studies of nurse counseling on smoking cessation during a screening health check, not included in the main meta-analysis, found that under these conditions nursing intervention had less effect. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe results indicate the potential benefits of smoking cessation advice and counseling given by nurses to their patients, with reasonable evidence that interventions can be effective. The challenge will be to incorporate smoking cessation intervention as part of standard practice so that all patients are given an opportunity to be queried about their tobacco use and to be given advice to quit along with reinforcement and follow-up.

Indexed as

CounselingNurse-Patient RelationsSmoking PreventionHumansNursing CareSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.