SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Do placebo response rates from cessation trials inform on strength of addictions?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012Pooled it
- [Effectiveness of a programme of intensive tobacco counselling by nursing professionals].Atencion primaria · 2006Trial
- Trial
- Interventions for Adherence Improvement in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: Expert Consensus Statement.Korean circulation journal · 2022Review
- Executive Summary of the 2018 Joint Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Italy.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2018Review
- Supporting pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women to quit smoking: views of antenatal care providers and pregnant indigenous women.Maternal and child health journal · 2014Article
- Factors associated with smoking among operating engineers.Workplace health & safety · 2013Article
- Individual participant data meta-analyses should not ignore clustering.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2013Article
- Perception of stroke and knowledge of potential risk factors among Omani patients at increased risk for stroke.BMC neurology · 2006Article
- [Recommendations on the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to smokers. Consensus document].Atencion primaria · 2002Article
- Meta-analysis, Simpson's paradox, and the number needed to treat.BMC medical research methodology · 2002Article
- Pooling data for number needed to treat: no problems for apples.BMC medical research methodology · 2002Article
- Simpson's paradox and calculation of number needed to treat from meta-analysis.BMC medical research methodology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth care professionals, including nurses, frequently advise patients to improve their health by stopping smoking. Such advice may be brief, or part of more intensive interventions.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of nursing delivered smoking cessation interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group register was searched for studies of interventions using nurses or health visitors and an additional search made on CINAHL. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials with follow-up of at least 6 months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently. MAIN
resultsSixteen studies comparing nursing intervention to a control or usual care found intervention to significantly increase the odds of quitting (Peto Odds Ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.29-1.73). There was heterogeneity between the study results, but pooling using a random effects model did not alter the estimate of effect. There was no evidence from indirect comparison that interventions classified as intensive had a larger effect than less intensive ones. There was limited evidence that interventions were more effective for hospital inpatients with cardiovascular disease than for inpatients with other conditions. Interventions in non hospitalised patients also showed evidence of benefit. Five studies of nurse counseling on smoking cessation during a screening health check, not included in the main meta-analysis, found that under these conditions nursing intervention had less effect. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe results indicate the potential benefits of smoking cessation advice and counseling given by nurses to their patients, with reasonable evidence that interventions can be effective. The challenge will be to incorporate smoking cessation intervention as part of standard practice so that all patients are given an opportunity to be queried about their tobacco use and to be given advice to quit along with reinforcement and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11686982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.