SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions aimed at reducing problems in adult patients discharged from hospital to home: a systematic meta-review.BMC health services research · 2007Pooled it
- Admission rates in a general practitioner-based versus a hospital specialist based, hospital-at-home model: ACCESS, an open-labelled randomised clinical trial of effectiveness.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018Trial
- Effects of locality based community hospital care on independence in older people needing rehabilitation: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Trial
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Genitourinary Cancer Care: Re-envisioning the Future.European urology · 2020Review
- New beginning for care for elderly people? National framework could transform care for older people in England.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital at home is defined as a service that provides active treatment by health care professionals, in the patient's home, of a condition that otherwise would require acute hospital in-patient care, always for a limited period.
objectivesTo assess the effects of hospital at home compared with in-patient hospital care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) specialised register, MEDLINE (1966 to 1996), EMBASE (1980 to 1995), Social Science Citation Index (1992 to 1995), Cinahl (1982 to 1996), EconLit (1969 to 1996), PsycLit 1987 to 1996), Sigle (1980 to 1995), and the Medical Care supplement on economic literature (1970 to 1990). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of hospital at home care compared with acute hospital in-patient care. The participants were patients aged 18 years and over. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN
resultsFor the update, 11 trials were added to the five included in the original review. Trials evaluating hospital at home for elderly patients with a mix of medical conditions and those recovering from elective surgery failed to detect a difference for patient health outcomes. The data for those recovering from a stroke was conflicting. One trial reported an increase in independence for those allocated to hospital at home, and another decreased communication and psychosocial well being at three months follow-up but not at six months follow-up. Patients allocated to hospital at home expressed greater satisfaction with care than those in hospital. Carers however expressed less satisfaction with hospital at home compared with hospital care. Allocation to hospital at home resulted in a reduction in hospital length of stay, but hospital at home increased overall length of care. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThis review does not support the development of hospital at home services as a cheaper alternative to in-patient care. Early discharge schemes for patients recovering from elective surgery and elderly patients with a medical condition may have a place in reducing the pressure on acute hospital beds, providing the views of the carers are taken into account. For these clinical groups hospital length of stay is reduced, although this is offset by the provision of hospital at home. The evidence supporting hospital at home for patients recovering from a stroke is conflicting. There is some evidence that admission avoidance schemes may provide a less costly alternative to hospital care. Future research should focus on admission avoidance schemes, and the effect of early discharge hospital at home schemes for patients recovering from a stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11686958What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.