Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11686886›Full record

ReviewRespiratory research2001

Genomic approaches to research in pulmonary hypertension.

M W Geraci, B Gao, Y Hoshikawa, M E Yeager, R M Tuder, N F Voelkel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perspective: pathobiological paradigms in pulmonary hypertension, time for reappraisal.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2020
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genetically manipulated mouse models of lung disease: potential and pitfalls.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2012
    Review
  5. Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in rodent pulmonary hypertension.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2010
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Pathology of pulmonary hypertension.Clinics in chest medicine · 2007
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M W GeraciDivision of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA. mark.geraci@uchsc.edu
B Gao
Y Hoshikawa
M E Yeager
R M Tuder
N F Voelkel

Funding

ENDOTHELIAL CELL PROLIFERATION IN PPHR01HL060913 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VOELKEL, NORBERT F · 1998 to 2000
$231k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL60913-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomics, or the study of genes and their function, is a burgeoning field with many new technologies. In the present review, we explore the application of genomic approaches to the study of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Candidate genes, important to the pathobiology of the disease, have been investigated. Rodent models enable the manipulation of selected genes, either by transgenesis or targeted disruption. Mutational analysis of genes in the transforming growth factor-beta family have proven pivotal in both familial and sporadic forms of primary PH. Finally, microarray gene expression analysis is a robust molecular tool to aid in delineating the pathobiology of this disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMiceMice, TransgenicMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID11686886
PMCPMC59578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.