Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11686543›Full record

Trial reportJournal of endocrinological investigation2001

Effects of low-dose losartan treatment on persistent microalbuminuria in normotensive type 1 diabetic subjects.

O Açbay

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

O AçbayDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical School Hospital, University of Istanbul, Turkey. oacbay@operamail.com
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the effect of low-dose losartan, an angiotensin II antagonist, on persistent microalbuminuria in normotensive Type 1 diabetes mellitus, 16 subjects with Type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to two 2-month treatment periods, with either losartan (25 mg/day) or enalapril (5 mg/day) in a single-blind cross-over design. Urinary albumin excretion (UAE), blood pressures, lipids, glycemia, HbA1C, serum potassium and creatinine clearance were measured before and after each treatment period. The UAEs were similarly reduced after both treatments. The median UAE decreased by 27.8%, from 162 (range 65-250) to 117 (34-190) mg/day (p<0.01) after enalapril, and decreased by 25%, from 160 (60-246) to 120 (36-184) mg/day (p<0.01) after losartan. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures also decreased significantly (p<0.05), whereas serum levels of potassium increased (p<0.01) after both treatments. The levels of serum HbA1c, mean fasting glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and creatinine clearances were not significantly (p>0.05 in all) changed by either the enalapril or losartan treatment. No significant differences were found between the effects of enalapril and losartan. In conclusion, losartan treatment reduces microalbuminuria as effectively as enalapril in normotensive Type 1 diabetic patients.

Indexed as

AdultAlbuminuriaAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Dose-Response Relationship, DrugEnalaprilHumansLosartanReference ValuesSingle-Blind MethodAntihypertensive AgentsEnalaprilLosartan

Identifiers

PMID11686543
OpenAlexW2026809064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.