ArticleAnnals of surgery2001
Value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with cystic tumors of the pancreas.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010Pooled it
- Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to monitor clinical outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.American journal of clinical oncology · 2010Trial
- FDG-PET is able to detect pancreatic carcinoma in chronic pancreatitis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2005Trial
- Misdiagnosis of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and the challenge of mimicking lesions: imaging diagnosis and differentiation strategies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Serous Cystadenoma: A Review on Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Usefulness ofSurgical case reports · 2020Article
- The Role of Positron Emission Tomography in Clinical Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas.Cancers · 2020Review
- Solid-Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas: A Single Center Experience.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2016Article
- Importance of Defect Detectability in Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Abdominal Lesions.Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2015Article
- F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors.SpringerPlus · 2015Article
- F18-FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN): a review of the literature.Japanese journal of radiology · 2013Review
- Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a review of preoperative diagnosis and management.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2013Review
- Positron emission tomography in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies: a review.American journal of surgery · 2012Review
- Imaging of the pancreas: Recent advances.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2011Article
- Solitary true cyst of pancreas: report of a case and review of literature.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2010Review
- Preoperative assessment of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2010Article
- Tumors of the Pancreatic Body and Tail.World journal of oncology · 2010Review
- Small multicentric pancreatic carcinoma usefully diagnosed by positron emission tomography.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2010Article
- Defining criteria for selective operative management of pancreatic cystic lesions: does size really matter?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the reliability of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18-FDG PET) in distinguishing benign from malignant cystic lesions of the pancreas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The preoperative differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas remains difficult: the most important point is to identify malignant or premalignant cysts that require resection. 18-FDG PET is a new imaging procedure based on the increased glucose metabolism by tumor cells and has been proposed for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
methodsDuring a 4-year period, 56 patients with a suspected cystic tumor of the pancreas underwent 18-FDG PET in addition to computed tomography scanning, serum CA 19-9 assay, and in some instances magnetic resonance imaging or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The 18-FDG PET was analyzed visually and semiquantitatively using the standard uptake value. The accuracy of 18-FDG PET and computed tomography was determined for preoperative diagnosis of a malignant cyst.
resultsSeventeen patients had malignant tumors. Sixteen patients (94%) showed 18-FDG uptake with a standard uptake value of 2.6 to 12.0. Twelve patients (70%) were correctly identified as having malignancy by computed tomography, CA 19-9 assay, or both. Thirty-nine patients had benign tumors: only one mucinous cystadenoma showed increased 18-FDG uptake (standard uptake value 2.6). Five patients with benign cysts showed computed tomography findings of malignancy. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for 18-FDG PET and computed tomography scanning in detecting malignant tumors were 94%, 97%, 94%, and 97% and 65%, 87%, 69%, and 85%, respectively.
conclusions18-FDG PET is more accurate than computed tomography in identifying malignant pancreatic cystic lesions and should be used, in combination with computed tomography and tumor markers assay, in the preoperative evaluation of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions. A positive result on 18-FDG PET strongly suggests malignancy and, therefore, a need for resection; a negative result shows a benign tumor that may be treated with limited resection or, in selected high-risk patients, with biopsy, follow-up, or both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.