Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11685032›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2001

Value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with cystic tumors of the pancreas.

C Sperti, C Pasquali, F Chierichetti, G Liessi, G Ferlin, S Pedrazzoli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. FDG-PET is able to detect pancreatic carcinoma in chronic pancreatitis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2005
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Usefulness ofSurgical case reports · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Imaging of the pancreas: Recent advances.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2011
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Tumors of the Pancreatic Body and Tail.World journal of oncology · 2010
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Defining criteria for selective operative management of pancreatic cystic lesions: does size really matter?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C SpertiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
C Pasquali
F Chierichetti
G Liessi
G Ferlin
S Pedrazzoli
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the reliability of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18-FDG PET) in distinguishing benign from malignant cystic lesions of the pancreas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The preoperative differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas remains difficult: the most important point is to identify malignant or premalignant cysts that require resection. 18-FDG PET is a new imaging procedure based on the increased glucose metabolism by tumor cells and has been proposed for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

methodsDuring a 4-year period, 56 patients with a suspected cystic tumor of the pancreas underwent 18-FDG PET in addition to computed tomography scanning, serum CA 19-9 assay, and in some instances magnetic resonance imaging or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The 18-FDG PET was analyzed visually and semiquantitatively using the standard uptake value. The accuracy of 18-FDG PET and computed tomography was determined for preoperative diagnosis of a malignant cyst.

resultsSeventeen patients had malignant tumors. Sixteen patients (94%) showed 18-FDG uptake with a standard uptake value of 2.6 to 12.0. Twelve patients (70%) were correctly identified as having malignancy by computed tomography, CA 19-9 assay, or both. Thirty-nine patients had benign tumors: only one mucinous cystadenoma showed increased 18-FDG uptake (standard uptake value 2.6). Five patients with benign cysts showed computed tomography findings of malignancy. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for 18-FDG PET and computed tomography scanning in detecting malignant tumors were 94%, 97%, 94%, and 97% and 65%, 87%, 69%, and 85%, respectively.

conclusions18-FDG PET is more accurate than computed tomography in identifying malignant pancreatic cystic lesions and should be used, in combination with computed tomography and tumor markers assay, in the preoperative evaluation of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions. A positive result on 18-FDG PET strongly suggests malignancy and, therefore, a need for resection; a negative result shows a benign tumor that may be treated with limited resection or, in selected high-risk patients, with biopsy, follow-up, or both.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, Emission-ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCystsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID11685032
PMCPMC1422093
OpenAlexW2093198260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.