Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11684722›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2001

p21(waf) correlates with DNA replication but not with prognosis in invasive breast cancer.

U J Göhring, A Bersch, M Becker, W Neuhaus, T Schöndorf

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biomolecular features of clinical relevance in breast cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2004
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

U J GöhringDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany.
A Bersch
M Becker
W Neuhaus
T Schöndorf
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsp21(waf) plays a central role both in the regulation of the cell cycle and in DNA replication. Accordingly, p21(waf) is a putative tumour suppressor. The role of p21(waf) expression in breast cancer is still unclear, particularly with respect to the clinical situation. Therefore, this retrospective study was designed to investigate the value of immunohistochemically detected p21(waf) expression in invasive breast cancer.

methodsCellular expression of p21(waf) was assessed in 307 breast cancer tissues by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal antibody, clone 4D10. The data were correlated to established and functional factors of prognosis (age, menopausal status, tumour size, nodal status, tumour grade, receptor status, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression, Her-2/neu expression, and p53 expression), and to clinical follow up (median observation time, 82 months).

resultsNinety nine of 307 (32.2%) tumour tissues were considered p21(waf) positive (nuclear staining). In the entire study group, p21(waf) expression correlated only with increased PCNA expression (chi(2) test: p = 0.029), and with none of the other investigated markers. In node negative patients (n = 134), p21(waf) expression correlated with increased tumour size and increased PCNA expression, whereas the node positive subgroup (n = 161) showed no correlation with these parameters (lymphonodectomy was done in 295 women). With respect to clinical outcome, p21(waf) expression showed a definite favourable trend in both subgroups (N0: p21(waf) negative, 23 of 87; p21(waf) positive, nine of 43. N+: p21(waf) negative, 63 of 107; p21(waf) positive, 23 of 52), but this observation was not significant (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis for disease free survival as indicated by Cox regression analysis included all factors investigated. The most striking parameters were nodal status (relative risk (RR), 1.74; p = 0.00001), receptor status (RR, 0.59; p = 0.0085), tumour size (RR, 1.42; p = 0.02), and Her2/neu expression (RR, 1.56; p = 0.033). p21(waf) expression was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p > 0.05).

conclusionsp21(waf) expression is an independent factor but fails to be of prognostic or predictive value in multivariate analysis. These data confirm the hypothesis of a p53 independent p21(waf) induction and suggest a functional role in the inhibition of PCNA mediated DNA replication.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsLigasesUbiquitin-Protein LigasesBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21CyclinsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA ReplicationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm ProteinsCDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21CyclinsDrosophila ProteinsLigasesNeoplasm ProteinsNerve Tissue Proteinsneur protein, DrosophilaProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID11684722
PMCPMC1731310
OpenAlexW2163837533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.