ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001
Effect of endocervical specimen adequacy on ligase chain reaction detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of endocervical-specimen adequacy on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the APTIMA COMBO 2 assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity of a commercially available PCR test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (Roche Diagnostics) is affected by the cellular quality of the endocervical swab specimens. The cellular adequacies of 1,633 female endocervical swab specimens were assessed and compared with the results of C. trachomatis detection obtained by ligase chain reaction (LCR; Abbott Laboratories). Specimen adequacy studies and LCR were performed with samples from the same swab, after demonstration of the stability of human epithelial cells in LCR transport medium. Prior to heat treatment of the swab specimen, an aliquot was removed and cytocentrifuged onto a slide. Cell spots were stained and examined at x 400 magnification for endocervical (columnar epithelial or metaplastic) cells and erythrocytes. The overall rate of positivity of the LCR was 6.5% (106 of 1,633 specimens) with pooled specimens (pools of 4 specimens each; reduced cutoff). Of the 1,633 specimens examined, 655 (40.1%) were found to contain one or more endocervical cells. The rate of positivity for C. trachomatis was 10.8% (71 of 655 specimens) among specimens containing endocervical cells, whereas it was 3.6% (35 of 978 specimens) among specimens lacking endocervical cells (P < 0.0001). There was no linear trend between the rate of positivity for C. trachomatis and the number of endocervical cells (P = 0.24). The rate of positivity for C. trachomatis was 5.4% (8 of 147 specimens) among specimens containing large numbers of erythrocytes (> or =100 per high-power field), whereas it was 6.6% (98 of 1,486 specimens) among specimens containing less than 100 erythrocytes per high-power field (P = 0.59). These results show that the sensitivity of the Abbott C. trachomatis LCR test is affected by the presence of endocervical cells. Additionally, they indicate that the presence of a single endocervical cell is as good an indicator of specimen adequacy as the presence of many endocervical cells. The presence of a large number of erythrocytes was not associated with an increased rate of sensitivity of the LCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.