Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11677186›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2001

Use of molecular probes to assess geographic distribution of Pfiesteria species.

P A Rublee, J W Kempton, E F Schaefer, C Allen, J Harris, D W Oldach, H Bowers, T Tengs, J M Burkholder, H B Glasgow

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protist taxonomy: an ecological perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2004
    Review
  6. Harmful algal blooms: causes, impacts and detection.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2003
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P A RubleeBiology Department, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 27402, USA. rublee@uncg.edu
J W Kempton
E F Schaefer
C Allen
J Harris
D W Oldach
H Bowers
T Tengs
J M Burkholder
H B Glasgow
University of North Carolina at Greensboro · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for the detection of Pfiesteria sp. in cultures and environmental samples. More than 2,100 water and sediment samples from estuarine sites of the U.S. Atlantic and gulf coasts were assayed for the presence of Pfiesteria piscicida Steidinger & Burkholder and Pfiesteria shumwayae Glasgow & Burkholder by PCR probing of extracted DNA. Positive results were found in about 3% of samples derived from routine monitoring of coastal waters and about 8% of sediments. The geographic range of both species was the same, ranging from New York to Texas. Pfiesteria spp. are likely common and generally benign inhabitants of coastal areas, but their presence maintains a potential for fish and human health problems.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, ProtozoanEnvironmental MonitoringFish DiseasesGeographyHumansPfiesteria piscicidaPolymerase Chain ReactionProtozoan InfectionsPublic HealthDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID11677186
PMCPMC1240608
OpenAlexW2015982957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.