Psychological implications of chemical and biological weapons.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Review of the Mental Health Sequelae of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Preparedness Perspective.Cureus · 2023
   Review
2. Five Decades of Global Chemical Terror Attacks: Data Analysis to Inform Training and Preparedness.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2021
   Article
3. Gendered lived experiences of marriage and family following exposure to chemical warfare agents: content analysis of qualitative interviews with survivors in Halabja, Kurdistan-Iraq.BMJ open · 2020
   Article
4. Epidemics of panic during a bioterrorist attack--a mathematical model.Medical hypotheses · 2009
   Article
5. Fear of terrorism in New York after the September 11 terrorist attacks: implications for emergency mental health and preparedness.International journal of emergency mental health · 2003
   Article
6. [Bioterrorism and primary care].Atencion primaria · 2002
   Review
7. Chemical weapons.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
   Review
8. Biological warfare and bioterrorism.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
   Review
9. Nuclear terrorism.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
   Review
10. Response to bioterrorism. Terror weapons are regarded as weapons of mass destruction.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
    Article
11. Assessing Community Reactions to Ebola Virus Disease and Other Disasters: Using Social Psychological Research to Enhance Public Health and Disaster Communications.International journal of emergency mental health
    Article
12. Fear of terrorism and preparedness in New York City 2 years after the attacks: implications for disaster planning and research.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response to bioterrorism. Terror weapons are regarded as weapons of mass destruction.2002

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as