Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11607292›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1992

Extension growth of the water mold Achlya: interplay of turgor and wall strength.

N P Money, F M Harold

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Hyphal growth in human fungal pathogens and its role in virulence.International journal of microbiology · 2012
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antifungal proteins.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2001
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N P MoneyDepartment of Biochemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
F M Harold
Colorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When hyphae of the water mold Achlya were subjected to osmotic stress, imposed with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-300 or sucrose, turgor pressure fell in proportion to the increase in external osmotic pressure. There was no evidence of turgor regulation, even over a period of days, yet the extension rate was unaffected until turgor was reduced to less than a third of the normal level of 0.6-0.8 MPa (6-8 bars). Measurements of the pressure at which the hyphae burst indicate that they respond to osmotic stress by softening their apical cell walls, sustaining extension growth despite reduced turgor pressure. The effect of osmolytes excluded by the wall was very different; superfusion of growing hyphae with PEG-6000 or dextran-6000 reduced turgor and stopped extension but did not induce wall softening. Furthermore, the hyphae did not resume growth during an hour or more of continuous exposure to these substances. Although the two classes of osmolytes have the same effect on turgor, they may induce different strains within the cell wall; this might then affect the capacity of the organism to detect the drop in turgor or to soften its cell wall. The interplay between turgor and wall strength supports the proposition that turgor supplies the driving force for extension and that production of the standard hyphal form requires a balance between hydrostatic pressure and a resistive cell wall.

Identifiers

PMID11607292
PMCPMC49058
OpenAlexW1971155811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.