Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11607047›Full record

ReviewCNS drug reviews2001

A review of the pharmacological and clinical profile of mirtazapine.

S A Anttila, E V Leinonen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drug reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 167 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02650544 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety Analyses of Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Malignant Tumor Related Depression: A Phase II, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Double-blinded Clinical Trial in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled236ConditionsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, DepressionArmsMirtazapine, Placebo
NCT04748523 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Mirtazapine Versus Placebo on Appetite, Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Non-small Cell Lung cáncer Patients With Anorexia; Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Cancerologia de MexicoRan2018 to 2022Enrolled86ConditionsAnorexia, Non-small Cell Lung CancerArmsMirtazapine, Placebo Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 777 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quantitative evaluation of multiple treatment regimens for treatment-resistant depression.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. What is the evidence for mirtazapine in treating cancer-related symptomatology? A systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Mirtazapine for fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Protective role of mirtazapine in adult female Mecp2Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2020
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Hyponatremia risk with antidepressant use: A retrospective study.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S A AnttilaDepartment of Psychogeriatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FIN-33380 Pitkäniemi, Finland. samia@koti.tpo.fi
E V Leinonen
Tampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel antidepressant mirtazapine has a dual mode of action. It is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA) that acts by antagonizing the adrenergic alpha2-autoreceptors and alpha2-heteroreceptors as well as by blocking 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors. It enhances, therefore, the release of norepinephrine and 5-HT1A-mediated serotonergic transmission. This dual mode of action may conceivably be responsible for mirtazapine's rapid onset of action. Mirtazapine is extensively metabolized in the liver. The cytochrome (CYP) P450 isoenzymes CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 are mainly responsible for its metabolism. Using once daily dosing, steady-state concentrations are reached after 4 days in adults and 6 days in the elderly. In vitro studies suggest that mirtazapine is unlikely to cause clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Dry mouth, sedation, and increases in appetite and body weight are the most common adverse effects. In contrast to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), mirtazapine has no sexual side effects. The antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine was established in several placebo-controlled trials. In major depression, its efficacy is comparable to that of amitriptyline, clomipramine, doxepin, fluoxetine, paroxetine, citalopram, or venlafaxine. Mirtazapine also appears to be useful in patients suffering from depression comorbid with anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance. It seems to be safe and effective during long-term use.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicDrug InteractionsHumansMianserinMirtazapineAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicMianserinMirtazapine

Identifiers

PMID11607047
PMCPMC6494141
OpenAlexW1991625714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.