Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11606752›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

Redundant control of rereplication in fission yeast.

V Gopalakrishnan, P Simancek, C Houchens, H A Snaith, M G Frattini, S Sazer, T J Kelly

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Crk4-Cyc4 complex regulates GThe EMBO journal · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Regulation ofMolecular cancer research : MCR · 2017
    Article
  4. Mechanisms and regulation of DNA replication initiation in eukaryotes.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2017
    Review
  5. Regulating DNA replication in eukarya.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  6. Genomic instability in cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevention of DNA re-replication in eukaryotic cells.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2011
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Geminin stabilizes Cdt1 during meiosis in Xenopus oocytes.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

V GopalakrishnanDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.
P Simancek
C Houchens
H A Snaith
M G Frattini
S Sazer
T J Kelly
Baylor College of Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initiation of DNA replication at replication origins in eukaryotic cells is tightly controlled to ensure that the genome is duplicated only once each cell cycle. We present evidence that in fission yeast, independent regulation of two essential components of the initiation complex, Cdc18 and Cdt1, contributes to the prevention of reinitiation of DNA replication. Cdc18 is negatively controlled by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation, but low level expression of a mutant form of Cdc18 lacking CDK phosphorylation sites (Cdc18(CDK)) is not sufficient to induce rereplication. Similar to Cdc18, Cdt1 is expressed periodically in the cell cycle, accumulating in the nucleus in G(1) and declining in G(2). When Cdt1 is expressed constitutively from an ectopic promoter, it accumulates in the nucleus throughout the cell cycle but does not promote reinitiation. However, constitutive expression of Cdt1, together with Cdc18(CDK), is sufficient to induce extra rounds of DNA replication in the absence of mitosis. Significantly greater levels of rereplication can be induced by coexpression of Cdc18(CDK) and a Cdt1 mutant lacking a conserved C-terminal motif. In contrast, uncontrolled DNA replication does not occur when either mutant protein is expressed in the absence of the other. Constitutive expression of wild-type or mutant Cdt1 also leads to an increase in the levels of Cdc18(CDK), possibly as a result of increased protein stability. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that control of rereplication depends on a redundant mechanism in which negative regulation of Cdt1 functions in parallel with the negative regulation of Cdc18.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalFluorescent Antibody TechniqueFungal ProteinsPhosphorylationPrecipitin TestsSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSubcellular Fractionscdc18 protein, S pombecdt1 protein, S pombeCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalFungal ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11606752
PMCPMC60833
OpenAlexW2089622255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.