Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11606647›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2001

Motion processing in the macaque: revisited with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

A S Tolias, S M Smirnakis, M A Augath, T Trinath, N K Logothetis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Illusory Motion Reversal in Touch.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. fMRI repetition suppression for familiar but not arbitrary actions with tools.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Electrophysiological correlates of default-mode processing in macaque posterior cingulate cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  15. Representation of eye movements and stimulus motion in topographically organized areas of human posterior parietal cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Charting the lower superior temporal region, a new motion-sensitive region in monkey superior temporal sulcus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2006
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A S ToliasMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, 72076 Germany. andreas.tolias@tuebingen.mpg.de
S M Smirnakis
M A Augath
T Trinath
N K Logothetis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A great deal is known about the response properties of single neurons processing sensory information. In contrast, less is understood about the collective characteristics of networks of neurons that may underlie sensory capacities of animals. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to study the emergent properties of populations of neurons processing motion across different brain areas. Using a visual adaptation paradigm, we localized a distributed network of visual areas that process information about the direction of motion as expected from single-cell recording studies. However, we found an apparent discrepancy between the directional signals in certain visual areas as measured with blood oxygenation level-dependent imaging compared with an estimate based on the spiking of single neurons. We propose a hypothesis that may account for this difference based on the postulate that neuronal selectivity is a function of the state of adaptation. Consequently, neurons classically thought to lack information about certain attributes of the visual scene may nevertheless receive and process this information. We further hypothesize that this adaptation-dependent selectivity may arise from intra- or inter-area cellular connections, such as feedback from higher areas. This network property may be a universal principle the computational goal of which is to enhance the ability of neurons in earlier visual areas to adapt to statistical regularities of the input and therefore increase their sensitivity to detect changes along these stimulus dimensions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdaptation, OcularAnimalsBrainBrain MappingMacaca mulattaMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID11606647
PMCPMC6762813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.