Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11606557›Full record

ArticleGenetics2001

Dynamics of microsatellite divergence under stepwise mutation and proportional slippage/point mutation models.

P P Calabrese, R T Durrett, C F Aquadro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Microsatellites as targets of natural selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mutational dynamics of microsatellites.Molecular biotechnology · 2010
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P P CalabreseDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
R T Durrett
C F Aquadro

Funding

MOLECULAR POPULATION GENETICS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTERR01GM036431 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI AQUADRO, CHARLES F · 1986 to 2010
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM36431NIGMS NIH HHS GM36431-14S1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently Kruglyak, Durrett, Schug, and Aquadro showed that microsatellite equilibrium distributions can result from a balance between polymerase slippage and point mutations. Here, we introduce an elaboration of their model that keeps track of all parts of a perfect repeat and a simplification that ignores point mutations. We develop a detailed mathematical theory for these models that exhibits properties of microsatellite distributions, such as positive skewness of allele lengths, that are consistent with data but are inconsistent with the predictions of the stepwise mutation model. We use our theoretical results to analyze the successes and failures of the genetic distances (delta(mu))(2) and D(SW) when used to date four divergences: African vs. non-African human populations, humans vs. chimpanzees, Drosophila melanogaster vs. D. simulans, and sheep vs. cattle. The influence of point mutations explains some of the problems with the last two examples, as does the fact that these genetic distances have large stochastic variance. However, we find that these two features are not enough to explain the problems of dating the human-chimpanzee split. One possible explanation of this phenomenon is that long microsatellites have a mutational bias that favors contractions over expansions.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPoint MutationAnimalsDrosophilaGenetic VariationHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID11606557
PMCPMC1461831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.