ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001
Adenosine-mediated hypotension in in vivo guinea-pig: receptors involved and role of NO.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adenosine receptor signaling in vascular diseases: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapeutics.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Purinoceptor: a novel target for hypertension.Purinergic signalling · 2023Review
- Optimization of Thermolytic Response to AThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2017Article
- Glucose-induced intestinal vasodilation via adenosine A1 receptors requires nitric oxide but not K(+)(ATP) channels.The Journal of surgical research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Adenosine produced a biphasic lowering of the mean BP with a drastic bradycardic effect at the highest doses. The first phase hypotensive response was significantly reduced by the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor L-NAME. 2. The A(2a)/A(2b) agonist NECA produced hypotensive and bradycardic responses similar to those elicited by adenosine, which were not significantly modified by the A(2b) antagonist enprofylline. 3. The A(2a) agonist CGS 21680 did not significantly influence basal HR while induced a hypotensive response antagonized by the A(2a) selective antagonist ZM 241385, and reduced by both L-NAME and the guanylate cyclase inhibitor methylene blue. 4. The A(1) agonist R-PIA showed a dose-dependent decrease in BP with a drastic decrease in HR at the highest doses. The A(1) selective antagonist DPCPX significantly reduced the bradycardic activity and also the hypotensive responses obtained with the lowest doses while it increased those obtained with the highest ones. 5. The A(1)/A(3) agonist APNEA, in the presence of the xanthinic non-selective antagonist 8-pSPT, maintained a significant hypotensive, but not bradycardic, activity, not abolished by the histamine antagonist diphenhydramine. 6. The selective A(3) agonist IB-MECA revealed a weak hypotensive and bradycardic effect, but only at the highest doses. 7. In conclusion, in the systemic cardiovascular response to adenosine two major components may be relevant: an A(2a)- and NO-mediated hypotension, and a bradycardic effect with a consequent hypotension, via atypical A(1) receptors. Finally, an 8-pSPT-resistant hypotensive response not attributable to A(3) receptor-stimulation or to release of histamine by mastocytes or other immune cells was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.