Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11606266›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2001

Understanding beta-hairpin formation by molecular dynamics simulations of unfolding.

J Lee, S Shin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling the mechanism of CLN025 beta-hairpin formation.The Journal of chemical physics · 2017
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hydrophobicity of transmembrane proteins: spatially profiling the distribution.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2003
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J LeeSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
S Shin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have studied the mechanism of formation of a 16-residue beta-hairpin from the protein GB1 using molecular dynamics simulations in an aqueous environment. The analysis of unfolding trajectories at high temperatures suggests a refolding pathway consisting of several transient intermediates. The changes in the interaction energies of residues are related with the structural changes during the unfolding of the hairpin. The electrostatic energies of the residues in the turn region are found to be responsible for the transition between the folded state and the hydrophobic core state. The van der Waals interaction energies of the residues in the hydrophobic core reflect the behavior of the radius of gyration of the core region. We have examined the opposing influences of the protein-protein (PP) energy, which favors the native state, and the protein-solvent (PS) energy, which favors unfolding, in the formation of the beta-hairpin structure. It is found that the behavior of the electrostatic components of PP and PS energies reflects the structural changes associated with the loss of backbone hydrogen bonding. Relative changes in the PP and PS van der Waals interactions are related with the disruption of the hydrophobic core of a protein. The results of the simulations support the hydrophobic collapse mechanism of beta-hairpin folding.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularProtein FoldingAnimalsBacterial ProteinsHydrogen BondingNerve Tissue ProteinsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesProtein Structure, SecondaryRibonucleasesStatic ElectricityThermodynamicsBacillus amyloliquefaciens ribonucleaseBacterial ProteinsG-substrateNerve Tissue ProteinsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesRibonucleasestendamistate

Identifiers

PMID11606266
PMCPMC1301720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.