Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11600364›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Activities of new macrolides and fluoroquinolones against Mycobacterium ulcerans infection in mice.

A Bentoucha, J Robert, H Dega, N Lounis, V Jarlier, J Grosset

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Drug Efficacy Testing in the Mouse Footpad Model of Buruli Ulcer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmacologic management ofExpert review of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  10. In Vivo Imaging of BioluminescentThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. In Silico Prediction of Antibiotic Resistance inThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  15. In Vitro Susceptibility ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Susceptibility Profiles ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A BentouchaLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
J Robert
H Dega
N Lounis
V Jarlier
J Grosset
Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice infected in the left hind footpad with 5 log(10) acid-fast bacilli of Mycobacterium ulcerans were divided into an untreated control group and 17 treatment groups that received one of the following regimens for 4 weeks (all doses in milligrams per kilogram): 100 mg of azithromycin (AZM), 100 mg of clarithromycin (CLR), or 50 mg of AZM for a duration of 5 days a week (daily), three times a week, or once weekly. In addition, the following regimens were administered daily: 100 mg of telithromycin (TLM), sparfloxacin (SPX), or moxifloxacin (MOX); 200 mg of levofloxacin (LVX); 100 mg of streptomycin (STR) or amikacin (AMK); 10 mg of rifampin (RIF); and the combination of 10 mg of RIF and 100 mg of AMK (RIF+AMK). After completion of treatment, mice were observed for 30 weeks. The effectiveness of treatment regimens was assessed in terms of the delay in median time to footpad swelling in treated mice compared with that in the untreated controls. Clear-cut bactericidal activity, i.e., an observed delay in footpad swelling that exceeded the period of treatment, was observed in the STR-, AMK-, and RIF+AMK-treated mice. However, all mice treated with either AMK or STR alone had swollen footpads before the end of the 30-week observation period, suggesting regrowth of M. ulcerans. In contrast, 50% of the mice treated with the RIF+AMK combination exhibited no lesion even after 30 weeks, suggesting cure. The remaining regimens could be assigned to one of three groups: (i) no activity (50 mg of AZM, 100 mg of AZM thrice weekly, TLM, and LVX); (ii) bacteriostatic activity, i.e., a delay in footpad swelling shorter than the 4-week treatment duration (100 mg of AZM daily or once weekly, CLR thrice or once weekly, and MOX); or (iii) weak bactericidal activity (CLR daily and SPX). The RIF+AMK combination and possibly RIF+STR warrant further study for the treatment of M. ulcerans infection in humans.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium ulceransAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsColony Count, MicrobialFemaleFluoroquinolonesFootMacrolidesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsFluoroquinolonesMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID11600364
PMCPMC90790
OpenAlexW2125687656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.