Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11599560›Full record

ArticleCell stress & chaperones2001

Arabidopsis thaliana type I and II chaperonins.

J E Hill, S M Hemmingsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stress & chaperones, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Calcium lignosulfonate modulates physiological and biochemical responses to enhance shoot multiplication inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. OsCpn60β1 is Essential for Chloroplast Development in Rice (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rubisco Assembly in the Chloroplast.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Reconstitution of Pure Chaperonin Hetero-Oligomer PreparationsFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J E HillNational Research Council, Plant Biotechnology Institute, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
S M Hemmingsen
National Research Council Canada · CAPlant Biotechnology Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An examination of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequence led to the identification of 29 predicted genes with the potential to encode members of the chaperonin family of chaperones (CPN60 and CCT), their associated cochaperonins, and the cytoplasmic chaperonin cofactor prefoldin. These comprise the first complete set of plant chaperonin protein sequences and indicate that the CPN family is more diverse than previously described. In addition to surprising sequence diversity within CPN subclasses, the genomic data also suggest the existence of previously undescribed family members, including a 10-kDa chloroplast cochaperonin. Consideration of the sequence data described in this review prompts questions about the complexities of plant CPN systems and the evolutionary relationships and functions of the component proteins, most of which have not been studied experimentally.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsChaperoninsChloroplastsDatabases, GeneticHumansMitochondriaMolecular ChaperonesMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySequence AlignmentArabidopsis ProteinsChaperoninsMolecular Chaperonesprefoldin

Identifiers

PMID11599560
PMCPMC434400
OpenAlexW2024581243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.