Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11597337›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2001

The olfactory receptor family album.

C Crasto, M S Singer, G M Shepherd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring Scent Distinction with Polymer Brush Arrays.ACS applied polymer materials · 2025
    Article
  5. Genomic Patterns are Associated with Different Sequelae of Patients with Long-Term COVID-19.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Computational Biology of Olfactory Receptors.Current bioinformatics · 2009
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Patterned variation in murine MHC promoters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C CrastoDepartment of Neurobiology, Yale University Medical School, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. gordon.shepherd@yale.edu
M S Singer
G M Shepherd

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of the human genome draft sequences has revealed a more complete portrait of the olfactory receptor gene repertoire in humans than was available previously. The new information provides a basis for deeper analysis of the functions of the receptors, and promises new insights into the evolutionary history of the family.

Indexed as

AnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanHumansPhylogenyReceptors, OdorantReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID11597337
PMCPMC138971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.