ReviewImmunologic research2001
Of mice and men: the relevance of the mouse to the study of human SLE.
Review in Immunologic research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laser Capture Microdissection of Pancreatic Acinar Cells to Identify Proteomic Alterations in a Murine Model of Caerulein-Induced Pancreatitis.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Pathogenic Inflammation and Its Therapeutic Targeting in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2015Review
- Novel therapeutic approaches to lupus glomerulonephritis: translating animal models to clinical practice.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2011Review
- Of mice and dogs: species-specific differences in the inflammatory response following myocardial infarction.The American journal of pathology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of mouse models have been utilized to study the pathophysiology of immune complex (IC) disease, and the hallmark IC disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Many of these studies have provided exciting new insights into IC-mediated inflammation and autoimmunity. However, numerous differences exist between mice and humans that suggest that mouse studies are not always applicable to human disease. These differences can be found in the biological systems that interact with circulating IC, in the specifics of disease presentation, and in the general physiology of the two species. Furthermore, although the mechanisms of SLE-like autoimmune disease in the mouse are being defined through analyses of the murine models of SLE, it remains to be proven that these mechanisms are relevant to human SLE. Thus, generalizing the results of the mouse studies to human SLE and other human IC diseases must be done with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.