Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11594454›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2001

C-reactive protein, inflammation, and innate immunity.

R F Mortensen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Old and New Aspects ofChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R F MortensenDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA. mortensen.3@osu.edu
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

LEUKOCYTE RECEPTORS FOR C-REACTIVE PROTEINR01CA030015 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MORTENSEN, RICHARD F · 1985 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA30015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circulating acute phase reactant C-reactive protein (CRP) has traditionally been characterized as an effector of nonclonal host resistance since it activates the classical complement cascade and mediates phagocytosis, but it is also capable of regulating inflammation. The three-dimensional structure of human CRP has revealed the molecular basis for complement activation and binding of phosphate monoesters. CRP gene expression by liver hepatocytes in response to cytokines (IL-1beta and IL-6) released in tissues requires several transcription factors which interact. Elevated levels of CRP are a prognostic marker for coronary artery disease; however, the role of CRP in atheriosclerosis remains unknown. CRP also mediates direct host protection to some microbial pathogens via its opsonic activity through certain Fcgamma-receptors. The CRP response may be one of the links between nonspecific innate immunity and specific clonal immunity.

Indexed as

Complement ActivationCoronary Artery DiseaseC-Reactive ProteinImmunity, InnateInflammationModels, MolecularPhagocytosisReceptors, ImmunologicC-Reactive ProteinCRP protein, humanReceptors, Immunologic

Identifiers

PMID11594454
OpenAlexW1967641907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.