Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11593832›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2001

A qualitative study of older people's views of out-of-hours services.

J Foster, J Dale, L Jessopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Out-of-hours special patient notes.London journal of primary care · 2013
    Article
  12. Out-of-hours special patient notes.London journal of primary care · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Does distance matter? Geographical variation in GP out-of-hours service use: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Out-of-hours palliative care: a qualitative study of cancer patients, carers and professionals.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J FosterGuy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, Division of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9PJ. judy.foster@kcl.ac.uk
J Dale
L Jessopp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOut-of-hours primary care services continues to change with the growth of general practitioner (GP) co-operatives and the more recent development of NHS Direct. While older people are more likely to have increased needs for such services, evidence suggests that they are reluctant users of GP out-of-hours services.

aimTo explore older people's experiences and perceptions of different models of general practice out-of-hours services. DESIGN OF STUDY: Focus group methodology, with qualitative data analysis undertaken using a grounded theory (Framework) approach.

settingThirty people aged between 65 and 81 years old from community groups based in south east London.

methodFour focus groups were held, each with between five and 12 participants. Each focus group session lasted 90 minutes and was audiotape-recorded with the permission of the participants. The tapes were transcribed verbatim.

resultsTwo related themes were identified. First, attitudes to health and healthcare professionals with reference to the use of health services prior to the establishment of the NHS, a stoical attitude towards health, and not wanting to make excessive demands on health services. Second, the experience of out-of-hours care and the perceived barriers to its use, including the use of the telephone and travelling at night. Participants preferred contact with a familiar doctor and were distrustful of telephone advice, particularly from nurses.

conclusionsOlder people appear reluctant to make use of out-of-hours services and are critical of the trend away from out-of-hours care being delivered by a familiar GP. With increasing numbers of older people in the population it is important to consider steps to address their reluctance to use out-of-hours and telephone advice services, particularly those based around less personal models of care.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Medical ServicesFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services for the AgedHumansLondonMaleNight CarePatient SatisfactionQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID11593832
PMCPMC1314099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.