Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11592975›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

A high-speed atomic force microscope for studying biological macromolecules.

T Ando, N Kodera, E Takai, D Maruyama, K Saito, A Toda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 280 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
280citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

280 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Switching Spike Plasticity Shapes ACE2 Engagement Across SARS-CoV-2 Variants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Programming DNA machines to move.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. HS-AFM Applications to Study Membrane Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

220 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T AndoDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan. tando@kenroku.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
N Kodera
E Takai
D Maruyama
K Saito
A Toda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The atomic force microscope (AFM) is a powerful tool for imaging individual biological molecules attached to a substrate and placed in aqueous solution. At present, however, it is limited by the speed at which it can successively record highly resolved images. We sought to increase markedly the scan speed of the AFM, so that in the future it can be used to study the dynamic behavior of biomolecules. For this purpose, we have developed a high-speed scanner, free of resonant vibrations up to 60 kHz, small cantilevers with high resonance frequencies (450-650 kHz) and small spring constants (150-280 pN/nm), an objective-lens type of deflection detection device, and several electronic devices of wide bandwidth. Integration of these various devices has produced an AFM that can capture a 100 x 100 pixel(2) image within 80 ms and therefore can generate a movie consisting of many successive images (80-ms intervals) of a sample in aqueous solution. This is demonstrated by imaging myosin V molecules moving on mica (see http://www.s.kanazawa-u.ac.jp/phys/biophys/bmv_movie.htm).

Indexed as

Microscopy, Atomic ForceMyosin Type VAnimalsChickensMyosin Type V

Identifiers

PMID11592975
PMCPMC60077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.