Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11592782›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2001

Effects of the combination of camptothecin and doxorubicin or etoposide on rat glioma cells and camptothecin-resistant variants.

V Pavillard, D Kherfellah, S Richard, J Robert, D Montaudon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of Endothelium in Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiomyopathy.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Synergistic antitumor activity of camptothecin-doxorubicin combinations and their conjugates with hyaluronic acid.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V PavillardLaboratoire de Pharmacologie des Médicaments Anticancéreux, Institut Bergonié et Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 180 rue de Saint-Genès, 33076 Bordeaux-cedex, France.
D Kherfellah
S Richard
J Robert
D Montaudon
Institut Bergonié · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the rat C6 glioma cell line in culture, we selected camptothecin-resistant variants by growth in the presence of increasing amounts of this drug (C6(CPT10), C6(CPT50)and C6(CPT100), growing respectively with 10, 50 and 100 ng ml(-1)camptothecin). The degree of resistance to camptothecin ranged between 15-fold (C6(CPT10)) and 30-fold (C6(CPT50)and C6(CPT100)). The C6(CPT10)cell line presented a collateral sensitivity to etoposide (3.6-fold), while the C6(CPT50)and C6(CPT100)cell lines were cross-resistant to etoposide (1.8-fold) The resistant lines were characterised by a two-fold reduced content and catalytic activity of topoisomerase I, and C6(CPT50)and C6(CPT100)presented a significant increase in topoisomerase IIalpha content and catalytic activity and a marked overexpression of P-glycoprotein. We explored the cytotoxicity of combinations of a topoisomerase I inhibitor (camptothecin) and a topoisomerase II inhibitor (doxorubicin or etoposide) at several molar ratios, allowing the evaluation of their synergistic or antagonistic effects on cell survival using the median effect principle. The simultaneous combination of camptothecin and doxorubicin or etoposide was additive or antagonistic in C6 cells, slightly synergistic in the C6(CPT10)line and never more than additive in the C6(CPT50)and C6(CPT100)cell lines. The sequential combination of doxorubicin and camptothecin gave additivity in the order camptothecin --> doxorubicin and antagonism in the order doxorubicin --> camptothecin. Clinical protocols combining a topoisomerase I and a topoisomerase II inhibitor should be considered with caution because antagonistic effects have been observed with combinations of camptothecin and doxorubicin.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCamptothecinDoxorubicinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEnzyme InhibitorsEtoposideGliomaRatsRats, WistarTumor Cells, CulturedCamptothecinDoxorubicinEnzyme InhibitorsEtoposide

Identifiers

PMID11592782
PMCPMC2375103
OpenAlexW2094027340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.