ArticleGenome research2001
DIAN: a novel algorithm for genome ontological classification.
Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical estimation and comparison of group-specific bivariate correlation coefficients in family-type clustered studies.Journal of applied statistics · 2022Article
- A rigorous approach to facilitate and guarantee the correctness of the genetic testing management in human genome information systems.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Advances in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Drug Discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2009Article
- An integrative genomic approach to uncover molecular mechanisms of prokaryotic traits.PLoS computational biology · 2006Article
- GO-Diff: mining functional differentiation between EST-based transcriptomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2006Article
- It's all GO for plant scientists.Plant physiology · 2005Article
- The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
- PANDORA: keyword-based analysis of protein sets by integration of annotation sources.Nucleic acids research · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faced with the determination of many completely sequenced genomes, computational biology is now faced with the challenge of interpreting the significance of these data sets. A multiplicity of data-related problems impedes this goal: Biological annotations associated with raw data are often not normalized, and the data themselves are often poorly interrelated and their interpretation unclear. All of these problems make interpretation of genomic databases increasingly difficult. With the current explosion of sequences now available from the human genome as well as from model organisms, the importance of sorting this vast amount of conceptually unstructured source data into a limited universe of genes, proteins, functions, structures, and pathways has become a bottleneck for the field. To address this problem, we have developed a method of interrelating data sources by applying a novel method of associating biological objects to ontologies. We have developed an intelligent knowledge-based algorithm, to support biological knowledge mapping, and, in particular, to facilitate the interpretation of genomic data. In this respect, the method makes it possible to inventory genomes by collapsing multiple types of annotations and normalizing them to various ontologies. By relying on a conceptual view of the genome, researchers can now easily navigate the human genome in a biologically intuitive, scientifically accurate manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.