Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11591642›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

Evolutionarily conserved sequences on human chromosome 21.

K A Frazer, J B Sheehan, R P Stokowski, X Chen, R Hosseini, J F Cheng, S P Fodor, D R Cox, N Patil

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

K A FrazerPerlegen Sciences, Santa Clara, California 95051, USA. kelly_frazer@perlegen.com
J B Sheehan
R P Stokowski
X Chen
R Hosseini
J F Cheng
S P Fodor
D R Cox
N Patil

Funding

CONSERVED REGULATORY SEQUENCES IN HUMANS AND MICER01GM057482 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI FRAZER, KELLY A · 1998 to 2002
$384k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-5748202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparison of human sequences with the DNA of other mammals is an excellent means of identifying functional elements in the human genome. Here we describe the utility of high-density oligonucleotide arrays as a rapid approach for comparing human sequences with the DNA of multiple species whose sequences are not presently available. High-density arrays representing approximately 22.5 Mb of nonrepetitive human chromosome 21 sequence were synthesized and then hybridized with mouse and dog DNA to identify sequences conserved between humans and mice (human-mouse elements) and between humans and dogs (human-dog elements). Our data show that sequence comparison of multiple species provides a powerful empiric method for identifying actively conserved elements in the human genome. A large fraction of these evolutionarily conserved elements are present in regions on chromosome 21 that do not encode known genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Conserved SequenceDNADogsGenes, OverlappingHumansMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificitySyntenyDNA

Identifiers

PMID11591642
PMCPMC311124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.