ArticleCell proliferation2001
Cell volume and rate of proliferation, but not protein expression pattern, distinguish pup/intimal smooth muscle cells from subcultured adult smooth muscle cells.
Article in Cell proliferation, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smooth muscle cells from neonatal rats and from injured blood vessels grow with a characteristic cobblestone morphology that distinguishes them from adult smooth muscle cells. This has led to the proposition that there are two distinct types of smooth muscle cells with different proliferative capacity. Here we systematically compare the properties of subcultured adult smooth muscle cells in culture and clonal lines of cobblestone smooth muscle cells from both neonatal rats and injured vessels. The cobblestone smooth muscle cells have a significantly smaller average cell volume, estimated using two different flow cytometry measurements. However, the two types of smooth muscle cells have indistinguishable protein expression patterns when the levels of more than 20 different proteins (including cytoskeletal proteins, matrix proteins, cytokines, cytokine receptors, adhesion molecules and enzymes) are measured by quantitative immunofluorescence. Furthermore, in contrast to previous observations, we demonstrate that both types of smooth muscle cells secrete a powerful mitogenic activity. The higher cell density achieved by the cobblestone smooth muscle cells in culture was responsible for the earlier reports that this mitogenic activity was secreted only by cobblestone smooth muscle cells. We conclude that many of the differences seen between cobblestone smooth muscle cells and adult smooth muscle cells in vitro (proliferation rate, morphology, protein expression pattern, secretion of mitogenic activity) could be attributable to a stable difference in the median cell volume of the cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.