Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11588251›Full record

ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2001

Making sense of eukaryotic DNA replication origins.

D M Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Various short autonomously replicating sequences from the yeastCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Control of DNA replication timing in the 3D genome.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  15. Comprehensive Analysis of Replication Origins inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D M GilbertDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. gilbertd@mail.upstate.edu

Funding

Specification of Mammalian Replication OriginsR01GM057233 · NIGMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GILBERT, DAVID M · 1998 to 2005
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-57233-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication is the process by which cells make one complete copy of their genetic information before cell division. In bacteria, readily identifiable DNA sequences constitute the start sites or origins of DNA replication. In eukaryotes, replication origins have been difficult to identify. In some systems, any DNA sequence can promote replication, but other systems require specific DNA sequences. Despite these disparities, the proteins that regulate replication are highly conserved from yeast to humans. The resolution may lie in a current model for once-per-cell-cycle regulation of eukaryotic replication that does not require defined origin sequences. This model implies that the specification of precise origins is a response to selective pressures that transcend those of once-per-cell-cycle replication, such as the coordination of replication with other chromosomal functions. Viewed in this context, the locations of origins may be an integral part of the functional organization of eukaryotic chromosomes.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDNA ReplicationReplication OriginAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesChromosomesDNAEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic and Fetal DevelopmentEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianEukaryotic CellsHumansModels, BiologicalProteinsDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID11588251
PMCPMC1255916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.