Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11585782›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2001

Mycolic acid analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography for identification of Mycobacterium species.

W R Butler, L S Guthertz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Four novel nontuberculous mycobacteria species:International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of three rapidly growing novelFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. TheFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W R ButlerDivision of AIDS, STD and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. wrb1@cdc.gov
L S Guthertz
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USDepartment of Health Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the etiologic agent of tuberculosis and can be accurately detected by laboratories using commercial genetic tests. Nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM) causing other mycobacterioses can be difficult to identify. The identification processes are confounded by an increasing diversity of newly characterized NTM species. The ubiquitous nature of NTM, combined with their potential to be opportunistic pathogens in immunocompromised as well as nonimmunodeficient patients, further complicates the problem of their identification. Since clinical case management varies depending on the etiologic agent, laboratories must identify the species in a timely manner. However, only a few identification methods can detect the species diversity within the Mycobacterium genus. Over the last decade, high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of the mycolic acids has become an accepted method for identification of mycobacteria. In this review, we assess its development and usefulness as an identification technique for Mycobacterium species.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidComputersFluorescent DyesHumansMycobacteriumMycolic AcidsSpecies SpecificityFluorescent DyesMycolic Acids

Identifiers

PMID11585782
PMCPMC88994
OpenAlexW2154368829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.