Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11582853›Full record

ArticleSozial- und Praventivmedizin2001

The Innsbruck Women's Health Study 1999: health status and behaviour.

H Ulmer, M Deibl, H Jäkel, K P Pfeiffer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sozial- und Praventivmedizin, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H UlmerInstitute of Biostatistics and Documentation, Leopold Franzens University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck. Hanno.Ulmer@uibk.ac.at
M Deibl
H Jäkel
K P Pfeiffer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study is to report descriptive results of a recent survey on women's health and to analyse associations between perceived health status and health behaviour.

methodsA cross-sectional survey on 609 women aged 20 to 95 years was performed in Innsbruck (Austria) in 1999.

resultsSelf-reported poor health status was 6% in the 20-39 age group, 10% in the 40-59 age group and 20% in the 60 and older age group. Age and physical activity were significant predictors for health status. Women who performed physical activities on a regular basis had a more than 70% reduced risk of poor health status. Concerning the prevalence of self-reported morbidity, urogenital disorders (35%), allergies (32%), and headache (42%) were most frequent in younger women whereas skeletal disorders such as rheumatic diseases (41%), osteoporosis (39%), and invertebral disc damage (39%) in older women. Important health behaviour-related problems to be found were 40% smoking among women under 40, and 42% overweight or obesity among women over 60. Stress affected 37% of women under 60 years of age.

conclusionsPhysical activity, smoking, overweight and stress revealed to be key-indicators for improving women's health.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Status IndicatorsWomen's HealthAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustriaChronic DiseaseFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID11582853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.