ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2001
Short-term comparative outcomes associated with the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients undergoing coronary intervention.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- 12-lipoxygenase: a potential target for novel anti-platelet therapeutics.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlatelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists reduce the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and urgent revascularization among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite a similar mechanism of platelet inhibition, the three currently approved agents vary widely in cost. PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospectively designed, retrospective analysis was to determine clinical outcomes for patients receiving abciximab, tirofiban or eptifibatide as adjunctive therapy during PCI at a single center. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes during hospitalization following PCI in patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide compared with those patients who received abciximab. Outcomes examined included in-hospital mortality, hemorrhagic procedural complications, need for recatheterization, peak creatine kinase following intervention and length of hospital stay (LOS).
resultsTwo hundred and sixty seven consecutive patients in whom GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy was initiated in the catheterization laboratory for PCI were analyzed. Abciximab-treated patients were more likely to be undergoing primary (p<0.001) and rescue (p=0.022) PCI and to have received fibrinolytic therapy (p=0.013) when compared to patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide. There were no significant differences between abciximab- and non abciximab-treated patients in either the primary PCI or non primary PCI groups in any of the studied endpoints. In patients undergoing primary PCI, abciximab-treated patients when compared with non abciximab-treated patients exhibited a trend toward an increase in hospital LOS (7.8+/-7.0 d vs 6.2+/-3.9, p=0.19) and in the frequency of hemorrhagic complications (22.1% vs 5.3%, p=0.11). In patients not receiving fibrinolytic therapy, abciximab-treated patients experienced a trend toward increased hemorrhagic complications following PCI when compared to non abciximab-treated patients (10.2% vs 6.0%, p=0.28). Complications distant from the vascular access site comprised 62.5% of hemorrhagic complications in the abciximab-treated group, but only 20% of the complications in the non-abciximab treated population (p<0.001). These data suggest no differences in acute outcomes between groups of patients receiving abciximab or other approved GP IIb/IIIa antagonists highlighting a potential significant cost saving. These data will require interpretation following the publication of comparative trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.