ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001
Wrong SIGN, NICE mess: is national guidance distorting allocation of resources?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global trends in the scientific research of the health economics: a bibliometric analysis from 1975 to 2022.Health economics review · 2023Article
- Assessment of Influential Variables in the Pricing of Locally Manufactured Pharmaceuticals: Current Challenging Situation in Iran.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2021Article
- Factors that influence rheumatologists' anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha prescribing decisions: a qualitative study.BMC rheumatology · 2019Article
- Article
- Review of Australian health economic evaluation - 245 interventions: what can we say about cost effectiveness?Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2008Article
- Principles versus procedures in making health care coverage decisions: addressing inevitable conflicts.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2008Article
- Economic evaluation and decision making in the UK.PharmacoEconomics · 2006Review
- Information created to evade reality (ICER): things we should not look to for answers.PharmacoEconomics · 2006Review
- Evidence based medicine guidelines: a solution to rationing or politics disguised as science?Journal of medical ethics · 2004Review
- Research ethics and evidence based medicine.Journal of medical ethics · 2004Review
- The 'NICE' approach to technology assessment: an economics perspective.Health care management science · 2004Article
- Article
- The NICE reference case requirement: more pain for what, if any, gain?PharmacoEconomics · 2004Article
- NICE methodological guidelines and decision making in the National Health Service in England and Wales.PharmacoEconomics · 2003Article
- A role for two-stage pharmacoeconomic appraisal? Is there a role for interim approval of a drug for reimbursement based on modelling studies with subsequent full approval using phase III data?PharmacoEconomics · 2003Article
- Are guidelines ethical? Some considerations for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Article
- National guidance and allocation of resources. Acting chairman of SIGN's response.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
- Is there a tension between doctors' duty of care and evidence-based medicine?Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.