ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001
Flow cytometry compared with indirect immunofluorescence for rapid detection of dengue virus type 1 after amplification in tissue culture.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteome modulation triggers potent antiviral response in Japanese Encephalitis Virus infected human macrophages.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- A gossypol derivative effectively protects against Zika and dengue virus infection without toxicity.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Performance evaluation of an indirect immunofluorescence kit for the serological diagnosis of dengue.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2020Article
- Detection of Dengue Virus-Specific IgM and IgG Antibodies through Peptide Sequences of Envelope and NS1 Proteins for Serological Identification.Journal of immunology research · 2020Article
- Review
- Use of flow cytometry for rapid, quantitative detection of poliovirus-infected cells via TAT peptide-delivered molecular beacons.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for dengue capsid.The open virology journal · 2012Article
- Dengue: a continuing global threat.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2010Review
- Detection of infective poliovirus by a simple, rapid, and sensitive flow cytometry method based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer technology.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2010Article
- The isomerase active site of cyclophilin A is critical for hepatitis C virus replication.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2009Article
- Quantitative measurement of varicella-zoster virus infection by semiautomated flow cytometry.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2009Article
- The laboratorial diagnosis of dengue: applications and implications.Journal of global infectious diseases · 2009Article
- Comparative analysis of full genomic sequences among different genotypes of dengue virus type 3.Virology journal · 2008Article
- Higher infection of dengue virus serotype 2 in human monocytes of patients with G6PD deficiency.PloS one · 2008Article
- Strategically examining the full-genome of dengue virus type 3 in clinical isolates reveals its mutation spectra.Virology journal · 2005Article
- Flow cytometry-based assay for titrating dengue virus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue virus (DV) was detected early in infected mosquito C6/36 cells by using indirect immunofluorescence (IF) in conjunction with flow cytometry. Three fixation-permeabilization methods and three DV serotype 1 (DEN-1)-specific monoclonal antibodies, 8-8 (anti-E), 16-4 (anti-NS1), and 15F3-1 (anti-NS1), were evaluated for the detection of DEN-1 in infected C6/36 cells. We found that these three monoclonal antibodies were capable of detecting DV in C6/36 cells as early as 24 h postinoculation by using a conventional indirect IF stain. Both 8-8 and 16-4 detected DV earlier and showed a greater number of DV-positive cells than 15F3-1. In flow cytometry, 3% paraformaldehyde plus 0.1% Triton X-100 with 16-4, the best fixation-permeabilization method for testing DV, showed higher sensitivity (up to 1 PFU) than indirect IF stain. The higher sensitivity of 16-4 in detecting DEN-1 was found with both IF and flow cytometry. Flow cytometry, which had a sensitivity similar to that of nested reverse transcription-PCR, was more sensitive in detecting DV in the infected mosquito cells 10 h earlier than the conventional IF stain. When clinical specimens were amplified in mosquito C6/36 cells and then assayed for DV using flow cytometry and conventional virus isolation at day 7 postinfection, both methods had 97.22% (35 out of 36) agreement. Moreover, among 12 positive samples which were detected by conventional culture method, the flow cytometry assay could detect DV in 58.33% (7 out of 12) of samples even at day 3 postinfection. In conclusion, both monoclonal antibodies 8-8 and 16-4 can be used for the early detection of DEN-1-infected C6/36 cells, with 16-4 (anti-NS1) being the best choice for the rapid diagnosis of DV by both the IF staining and flow cytometry methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.