Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11574582›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001

Multiplex PCR using internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 regions for rapid detection and identification of yeast strains.

S I Fujita, Y Senda, S Nakaguchi, T Hashimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Discrimination of Clinical and Food-DerivedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Endophytic fungi from Cissus quadrangularis plant a promising source of bioactive compounds.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Granulomatous dermatitis caused byJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S I FujitaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Japan. fujita-knz@umin.ac.jp
Y Senda
S Nakaguchi
T Hashimoto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiplex PCR amplification followed by either agarose gel electrophoresis (PCR-AGE) or microchip electrophoresis (PCR-ME) was used to test a total of 120 fungal strains. The internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and ITS2 regions and the 5.8S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) region of the fungi were amplified by using universal primers ITS1 and ITS4. The ITS2 region was simultaneously amplified by using universal primers ITS3 and ITS4. Since Trichosporon asahi and T. asteroides showed similar lengths for two amplicons, 29 different gel patterns were demonstrated for 30 yeast species tested on the basis of differences in the lengths of one or two amplicons. Of 75 yeast isolates from clinical materials, 5 isolates (6.8%) which were incompletely identified or not identified by the phenotypic method were identified with our PCR-based method (2 isolates as Candida guilliermondii, 2 as C. krusei, and 1 as C. zeylanoides). No differences in discriminating power or sensitivity were observed between the PCR-AGE method and the PCR-ME method. These methods, prospectively applied to 24 yeast-positive blood culture bottles (16 patients), resulted in the correct detection of 24 yeast strains. In conclusion, multiplex PCR followed by electrophoresis seems to be a promising tool for the rapid identification of common and uncommon yeast strains from culture colonies and from yeast-positive blood culture bottles (5.5 h for the PCR-AGE method and 3 h for the PCR-ME method).

Indexed as

DNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerElectrophoresis, Agar GelFungemiaHumansMycological Typing TechniquesMycosesPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8STime FactorsYeastsDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S

Identifiers

PMID11574582
PMCPMC88398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.