ReviewGenome biology2001
Being in the right location at the right time.
Review in Genome biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide RNAi screening identifies human proteins with a regulatory function in the early secretory pathway.Nature cell biology · 2012Article
- Immunolabeling artifacts and the need for live-cell imaging.Nature methods · 2012Article
- Development of a high-throughput method for the systematic identification of human proteins nuclear translocation potential.BMC cell biology · 2009Article
- In vivo direct molecular imaging of early tumorigenesis and malignant progression induced by transgenic expression of GFP-Met.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2006Article
- The subcellular localization of the mammalian proteome comes a fraction closer.Genome biology · 2006Review
- Automatic identification of subcellular phenotypes on human cell arrays.Genome research · 2004Article
- LIFEdb: a database for functional genomics experiments integrating information from external sources, and serving as a sample tracking system.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
- Localizing the proteome.Genome biology · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Taking each coding sequence from the human genome in turn and identifying the subcellular localization of the corresponding protein would be a significant contribution to understanding the function of each of these genes and to deciphering functional networks. This article highlights current approaches aimed at achieving this goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.