Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11574060›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2001

The nuclear pore complex.

S A Adam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Context-dependent prediction of protein complexes by SiComPre.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Nuclear import of serum response factor in airway smooth muscle.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Mitogen activated protein kinase at the nuclear pore complex.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S A AdamDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. s-adam@northwestern.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear pore complexes, the conduits for information exchange between the nucleus and cytoplasm, appear broadly similar in eukaryotes from yeast to human. Precisely how nuclear pore complexes regulate macromolecular and ionic traffic remains unknown, but recent advances in the identification and characterization of components of the complex by proteomics and genomics have provided new insights.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsHumansNuclear PoreNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsProteomeNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID11574060
PMCPMC138961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.