Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11571143›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2001

beta-Glutamate as a substrate for glutamine synthetase.

P Robinson, K Neelon, H J Schreier, M F Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P RobinsonMerkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA.
K Neelon
H J Schreier
M F Roberts
Boston College · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conversion of beta-glutamate to beta-glutamine by archaeal and bacterial glutamine synthetase (GS) enzymes has been examined. The GS from Methanohalophilus portucalensis (which was partially purified) is capable of catalyzing the amidation of this substrate with a rate sevenfold less than the rate obtained with alpha-glutamate. Recombinant GS from the archaea Methanococcus jannaschii and Archaeoglobus fulgidus were considerably more selective for alpha-glutamate than beta-glutamate as a substrate. All the archaeal enzymes were much less selective than the two bacterial GS (from Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis), whose specific activities towards beta-glutamate were much smaller than rates with the alpha-isomer. These results are discussed in light of the observation that beta-glutamate is accumulated as an osmolyte in many archaea while beta-glutamine (produced by glutamine synthetase) is used as an osmolyte only in M. portucalensis.

Indexed as

AnimalsArchaeaBacillus subtilisEscherichia coliGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseGlutamatesRatsSubstrate Specificity3-aminoglutaric acidGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseGlutamates

Identifiers

PMID11571143
PMCPMC93190
OpenAlexW2105905907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.