ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2001
Genomewide scans of complex human diseases: true linkage is hard to find.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 125 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide linkage scans for renal function traits.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2012Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide scans provides evidence for sex- and site-specific regulation of bone mass.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2007Pooled it
- Osteoarthritis susceptibility loci defined by genome scan meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2006Pooled it
- Osteoarthritis susceptibility loci defined by genome scan meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2006Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide linkage studies for bone mineral density.Journal of human genetics · 2006Pooled it
- Systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility loci defined by genome scan meta-analysis.Human genetics · 2005Pooled it
- Meta-analysis in psychiatric genetics.Current psychiatry reports · 2005Pooled it
- Ankylosing spondylitis susceptibility loci defined by genome-search meta-analysis.Journal of human genetics · 2005Pooled it
- Genetic polymorphisms and personality in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2003Pooled it
- Replication of 1q42 linkage in Finnish schizophrenia pedigrees.Molecular psychiatry · 2004Trial
- The classification method of donkey breeds based on SNPs data and machine learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- LUSTR: a new customizable tool for calling genome-wide germline and somatic short tandem repeat variants.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Genetics, epigenetics, and transcriptomics of preterm birth.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2022Review
- The Genetic Basis of Moyamoya Disease.Translational stroke research · 2022Review
- Association analysis of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in North England population with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.African health sciences · 2021Article
- Targeted Gene Candidates for Treatment and Early Diagnosis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Genetic test for the prescription of diets in support of physical activity.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020Article
- Genotypes and Phenotypes: A Search for Influential Genes in Diabetic Retinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Machine learning analysis of exome trios to contrast the genomic architecture of autism and schizophrenia.BMC psychiatry · 2020Article
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many "complex" human diseases, which involve multiple genetic and environmental determinants, have increased in incidence during the past 2 decades. During the same time period, considerable effort and expense have been expended in whole-genome screens aimed at detection of genetic loci contributing to the susceptibility to complex human diseases. However, the success of positional cloning attempts based on whole-genome screens has been limited, and many of the fundamental questions relating to the genetic epidemiology of complex human disease remain unanswered. Both to review the success of the positional cloning paradigm as applied to complex human disease and to investigate the characteristics of the whole-genome scans undertaken to date, we created a database of 101 studies of complex human disease, which were found by a systematic Medline search (current as of December 2000). We compared these studies, concerning 31 different human complex diseases, with regard to design, methods, and results. The "significance" categorizations proposed by Lander and Kruglyak were used as criteria for the "success" of a study. Most (66.3% [n=67]) of the studies did not show "significant" linkage when the criteria of Lander and Kruglyak (1995) were used, and the results of studies of the same disease were often inconsistent. Our analyses suggest that no single study design consistently produces more-significant results. Multivariate analysis suggests that the only factors independently associated with increased study success are (a) an increase in the number of individuals studied and (b) study of a sample drawn from only one ethnic group. Positional cloning based on whole-genome screens in complex human disease has proved more difficult than originally had been envisioned; detection of linkage and positional cloning of specific disease-susceptibility loci remains elusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.