ArticleThe Histochemical journal2001
Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in normal and tumour oral tissues assessed with different antibodies.
Article in The Histochemical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in canine oral squamous cell carcinomas.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- Correlation of polymorphisms of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene and the risk of lung cancer in an ethnic Han group of North China.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2012Article
- Targeted molecular therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor vandetanib in a mouse model.Head & neck · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in oral tissues was assessed using different antibodies. Quantitative and topographical differences were observed between paraffin and cryostat sections. Two polyclonal antibodies (PC36, PC37) differing in their cross-reactivity with VEGF121 (not recognized by PC36), were used to stain serial cryostat sections of normal oral mucosa (n = 8) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 7). The expression of VEGF in the epithelium was overall higher with PC37 than with PC36, the difference being significant in normal oral mucosa (p = 0.001) but not in squamous cell carcinoma samples (p = 0.094). With PC36, VEGF expression was significantly higher in squamous cell carcinoma than in normal oral mucosa specimens, whereas the opposite was true with PC37. Our results suggest that the relative levels of isoform 121 to that of 165 (and possibly others) may be different in the tissues examined, with VEGF121 preferentially expressed in normal oral mucosa. Previously published conflicting results may, therefore, be due to the presence of variable ratios of VEGF isoforms in the tissues examined, combined with differences in the cross-reactivity of the antibodies used. VEGF isoforms 121, 165 and (for the first time) 189 were detected in two frozen oral tissues by polymerase chain reaction amplification. Quantification of specific VEGF isoforms will be required in future studies concerned with the clinical value of VEGF expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.