ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001
Use of risk adjustment in setting budgets and measuring performance in primary care I: how it works.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Adjustment in Capitation Payments to Primary Care Providers: Does It Matter How We Account for Patients' Socioeconomic Status?Medical care · 2025Article
- Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study.BMC health services research · 2017Review
- Multimorbidity and equity in health.International journal for equity in health · 2013Article
- Assessing socioeconomic health care utilization inequity in Israel: impact of alternative approaches to morbidity adjustment.BMC public health · 2011Article
- "Impactibility models": identifying the subgroup of high-risk patients most amenable to hospital-avoidance programs.The Milbank quarterly · 2010Article
- Development and validation of a risk-adjustment tool in acute asthma.Health services research · 2009Article
- Validation of ACG Case-mix for equitable resource allocation in Swedish primary health care.BMC public health · 2009Article
- Clinical categories of patients and encounter rates in primary health care - a three-year study in defined populations.BMC public health · 2006Article
- Case-mix and variation in specialist referrals in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005Article
- Use of risk adjustment in setting budgets and measuring performance in primary care II: advantages, disadvantages, and practicalities.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.