Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11557500›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients.

R S Malone, D N Fish, E Abraham, I Teitelbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Early Oral Antibiotic Switch in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia: The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Early Oral Switch Protocol.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Comparison of adsorption of selected antibiotics on the filters in continuous renal replacement therapy circuits: in vitro studies.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R S MaloneDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, School of Pharmacy, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
D N Fish
E Abraham
I Teitelbaum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were studied in intensive care unit patients during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH; four patients received levofloxacin, and five received ciprofloxacin) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF; six patients received levofloxacin, and five received ciprofloxacin). Levofloxacin clearance was substantially increased during both CVVH and CVVHDF, while ciprofloxacin clearance was affected less. The results of this study suggest that doses of levofloxacin of 250 mg/day and ciprofloxacin of 400 mg/day are sufficient to maintain effective drug concentrations in the plasma of patients undergoing CVVH or CVVHDF.

Indexed as

LevofloxacinAdultAgedAnti-Infective AgentsCiprofloxacinCritical IllnessFemaleHemofiltrationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOfloxacinRenal InsufficiencyRenal Replacement TherapyAnti-Infective AgentsCiprofloxacinLevofloxacinOfloxacin

Identifiers

PMID11557500
PMCPMC90762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.