Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11556684›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2001

Paraproteinemic neuropathies.

A Vital

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Atypical B12 deficiency with nonresolving paraesthesia.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2013
    Article
  6. An update on monoclonal gammopathy and neuropathy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2012
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2009
    Article
  9. Peripheral neuropathies in Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2006
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A VitalDepartment of Neuropathology, Victor Ségalen University, Bordeaux, France. anne.vital@neuropath.u-bordeaux2.fr
Galen University · BZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of a peripheral neuropathy (PN) in association with a monoclonal gammopathy is quite common and suggests that monoclonal proteins may play a pathogenetic role in peripheral nervous system damage. In fact, paraproteinemic PN constitute an heterogeneous group of disorders related to various pathogenetic factors, and the histopathologic features in peripheral nerve biopsies differ from one condition to another. In several well defined disorders, the responsibility of the monoclonal component in the development of the PN has been evidenced. This is the case for most of the PN associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy, either a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) or Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. The responsibility of the monoclonal protein in the occurrence of amyloid neuropathy related to multiple myeloma is also recognized. However, most IgG or IgA MGUS, as well as the monoclonal component in POEMS syndrome, have an uncertain causal relationship with the neuropathy. PN associated with monoclonal cryoglobulin (type 1) are occasional and differ from those associated with mixed cryoglobulins (types 2 or 3).

Indexed as

CryoglobulinemiaHumansImmunoglobulin MMultiple MyelomaMyelin SheathParaproteinemiasPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPOEMS SyndromeWaldenstrom MacroglobulinemiaImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID11556684
PMCPMC8098264
OpenAlexW4247492749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.