ReviewDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2001
Genotype-phenotype correlations and differential diagnosis in autosomal dominant macular disease.
Review in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Insights on the Regulatory Gene Network Disturbed in Central Areolar Choroidal Dystrophy-Beyond Classical Gene Candidates.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Pooled it
- A pilot investigation of audiovisual processing and multisensory integration in patients with inherited retinal dystrophies.BMC ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Abnormal cone ERGs in a family with congenital nystagmus and photophobia harboring a p.X423Lfs mutation in the PAX6 gene.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2015Article
- A novel variant of autosomal recessive best vitelliform macular dystrophy and management of early-onset complications.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past few years, great progress has been made in the understanding of macular diseases. A number of disease-causing genes have been cloned, and numerous loci for other conditions have been mapped. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the current understanding of the genotype-phenotype correlations in autosomal dominant macular diseases with an emphasis on differential diagnostic issues. Whenever possible, the molecular correlates have been reviewed and the implications for age-related macular degeneration have been discussed. The many similarities of these diseases to age-related macular degeneration of the atrophic or exudative type, which can be misleading in elderly subjects, have also been addressed. While some conditions yield disease truly confined to the macula, others show widespread retinal involvement on functional testing. Clear-cut genotype-phenotype correlations are possible only for some forms of macular diseases. To further complicate the diagnostic process, there is a considerable degree of clinical overlap between many of them, making the differential diagnostic process potentially challenging. Functional testing, careful assessment of family history and extensive family work-up are essential in differentiating at the clinical level most, but not all, of these disease entities. Awareness of all of these conditions is required to direct correctly diagnostic investigations, to formulate an accurate prognosis, and for proper genetic counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.