ReviewDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2001
Molecular genetics of macular degeneration.
Review in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- CaActa physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Two novel mutations in the bestrophin-1 gene and associated clinical observations in patients with best vitelliform macular dystrophy.Molecular medicine reports · 2015Article
- AAV-mediated knockdown of peripherin-2 in vivo using miRNA-based hairpins.Gene therapy · 2010Article
- Retention of function without normal disc morphogenesis occurs in cone but not rod photoreceptors.The Journal of cell biology · 2006Article
- Molecular characterization of the skate peripherin/rds gene: relationship to its orthologues and paralogues.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macular degeneration is a leading cause of blindness that affects the aged population. The complexity of the molecular basis of macular disease is now beginning to be elucidated with the identification of disease-causing genes. For example, mutations in the ABCR gene, (recently identified in cones as well) which codes for retinal rod-specific ABCR protein is responsible for Stargardt macular dystrophy/fundus flavimaculatus, an autosomal recessive macular dystrophy with juvenile onset, which accounts for 7% of human retinal degenerative diseases. The gene mutant in X-linked juvenile retinoschisis, XLRS1, is the first macular dystrophy gene to be isolated by positional cloning. Mutations in the peripherin/RDS gene have been shown to be associated with a variety of distinct forms of macular degenerations. The tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3) is implicated in autosomal dominant Sorsby fundus dystrophy. Best vitelliform macular dystrophy was mapped to 11q12-q13. The cloned gene product is the protein bestrophin, which is a retinal specific gene expressed in the RPE and possibly involved in the metabolism and transport of polyunsaturated fatty acids. The cloning of genes for rare heritable forms of macular degeneration will increase our understanding of the basic pathogenesis of the disease process. In the future this should also allow us to test the hypothesis that the coincidence of subclinical mutations in a number of genes involved in the formation and function of the macula can be responsible for cases of age-related macula-degeneration which is by far the most common form of these macular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.