Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11551378›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2001

What is the optimal strategy to intensify blood pressure control and prevent progression of renal failure?

M Epstein, S Tobe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M EpsteinNephrology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL 33125, USA.
S Tobe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical trials clearly demonstrate that patients with diabetes and hypertension, and patients with renal disease and hypertension, should have their blood pressure lowered intensively. A recent analysis of long-term clinical trials over the past 8 years clearly demonstrates that the lower the blood pressure over a range of values, the greater the preservation of renal function. It is also readily apparent that monotherapy does not suffice in attaining these more intensified goals. A review of five clinical trials in the recent National Kidney Foundation consensus report demonstrates that patients randomized to the lower level of blood pressure required an average of 3.2 different antihypertensive medications taken daily. Consequently, it is evident that the question is no longer what the initial preferred monotherapy should be, but rather what should be the optimal drug to add to an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. In this paper we review data from several recent studies clearly indicating that to achieve goal blood pressure in the clinical setting of metabolic disarray and hyperglycemia, long-acting calcium antagonists constitute an excellent add-on agent for enhancing efficacy. We anticipate that the data that will accrue from the IDNT and RENAAL studies will further delineate the renal effects of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansHypertensionIncidenceKidney Failure, ChronicPrevalenceAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.