Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11549577›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2001

Solution-based scanning for single-base alterations using a double-stranded DNA binding dye and fluorescence-melting profiles.

K S Elenitoba-Johnson, S D Bohling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K S Elenitoba-JohnsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA. kojo.elenitobaj@path.utah.edu
S D Bohling

Funding

EXPRESSION PROFILING OF PROGRESSED FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMASR21CA083984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELENITOBA-JOHNSON, KOJO SEYS · 2000 to 2001
$225k
NCI NIH HHS CA 83984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA molecules differing by as little as a single-base substitution have traditionally been distinguished by gel electrophoresis-based methodologies that exploit differences in the sequence-specific properties of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) such as melting temperature and secondary conformational configuration. By comparison, solution-based fluorescence methods using sequence-specific probes are limited to detecting mutations restricted to very short segments of DNA ( approximately 20 bp). We describe a solution-based fluorescence method that discriminates between wild-type and mutant sequences using a dsDNA binding dye, and interrogates a region of >200 nucleotides. This method is based on melting theory and entails fluorescence monitoring of the melting temperatures of GC-clamped amplicons subjected to gradual and progressive thermal denaturation in the presence of a constant concentration of urea. Heterozygous samples are easily identified by the lower melting temperatures of the less thermodynamically stable heteroduplex mismatches from the wild-type:mutant DNA hybrids as compared to the more stable wild-type Watson-Crick duplexes. All of the four possible sets of mismatches (A.G/T.C, T.G/A.C, G.G/C.C, and T.T/A.A) represented in 17 heterozygous mutations distributed throughout the length of 20 different amplicons (104 to 212 bp), were distinguished from the wild-type by their altered melting profiles. This methodology is advantageous in that it obviates gel electrophoresis or labeled oligonucleotide probes. Significantly, it expands the region of interrogation for detection of single-base changes using fluorescence-based methods in solution, and is amenable for automation and adaptation to high-throughput systems.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAlgorithmsBase SequenceColoring AgentsDNAFemaleFluorescenceForecastingHumansModels, GeneticMutationNucleic Acid DenaturationReference ValuesSolutionsTemperatureColoring AgentsDNASolutions

Identifiers

PMID11549577
PMCPMC1850450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.