ArticleGenome research2001
SGP-1: prediction and validation of homologous genes based on sequence alignments.
Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Retinome - defining a reference transcriptome of the adult mammalian retina/retinal pigment epithelium.BMC genomics · 2004Pooled it
- Comparative complete chloroplast genome of Geum japonicum: evolution and phylogenetic analysis.Journal of plant research · 2024Article
- Integrated entropy-based approach for analyzing exons and introns in DNA sequences.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Whole-Genome Alignment and Comparative Annotation.Annual review of animal biosciences · 2019Review
- OMGene: mutual improvement of gene models through optimisation of evolutionary conservation.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- An optimized approach for annotation of large eukaryotic genomic sequences using genetic algorithm.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Next-generation annotation of prokaryotic genomes with EuGene-P: application to Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2013Article
- Finding protein-coding genes through human polymorphisms.PloS one · 2013Article
- Approaches to Fungal Genome Annotation.Mycology · 2011Article
- Shotgun proteomics aids discovery of novel protein-coding genes, alternative splicing, and "resurrected" pseudogenes in the mouse genome.Genome research · 2011Article
- Testing the coding potential of conserved short genomic sequences.Advances in bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Investigation of G72 (DAOA) expression in the human brain.BMC psychiatry · 2008Article
- Chromosome-wide identification of novel imprinted genes using microarrays and uniparental disomies.Nucleic acids research · 2006Article
- Phylogeny based discovery of regulatory elements.BMC bioinformatics · 2006Article
- SAGE2Splice: unmapped SAGE tags reveal novel splice junctions.PLoS computational biology · 2006Article
- NovelFam3000--uncharacterized human protein domains conserved across model organisms.BMC genomics · 2006Article
- GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE.Genome biology · 2006Article
- The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006.Nucleic acids research · 2006Article
- Using several pair-wise informant sequences for de novo prediction of alternatively spliced transcripts.Genome biology · 2006Article
- Vertebrate gene finding from multiple-species alignments using a two-level strategy.Genome biology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional methods of gene prediction rely on the recognition of DNA-sequence signals, the coding potential or the comparison of a genomic sequence with a cDNA, EST, or protein database. Reasons for limited accuracy in many circumstances are species-specific training and the incompleteness of reference databases. Lately, comparative genome analysis has attracted increasing attention. Several analysis tools that are based on human/mouse comparisons are already available. Here, we present a program for the prediction of protein-coding genes, termed SGP-1 (Syntenic Gene Prediction), which is based on the similarity of homologous genomic sequences. In contrast to most existing tools, the accuracy of depends little on species-specific properties such as codon usage or the nucleotide distribution. may therefore be applied to nonstandard model organisms in vertebrates as well as in plants, without the need for extensive parameter training. In addition to predicting genes in large-scale genomic sequences, the program may be useful to validate gene structure annotations from databases. To this end, SGP-1 output also contains comparisons between predicted and annotated gene structures in HTML format. The program can be accessed via a Web server at http://soft.ice.mpg.de/sgp-1. The source code, written in ANSI C, is available on request from the authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.